|
|
Alaska Bulletin AK300-8-3Date: November 26, 2007 Subject: LTP - Clarify Policy Related to Modifications of Conservation Contracts Purpose: To advise field offices of signature requirements when making modifications to contracts Expiration Date: September 30, 2008 Background: All District Conservationists should be well versed in contract modification policy found in CPM part 512, subpart F. This bulletin is intended to clarify national policy for NRCS Alaska employees regarding several key aspects of Conservation Program Contract Administration. Participant Signatures: CPM part 512, Conservation Program Contracting - 512.50(c) and 512.50(d) explains which modifications require signatures from participants. When a modification is processed which requires participant signature, this signature will always be obtained before the modification is submitted for approval. NRCS approval in Protracts finalizes a modification, which may entail obligation or practice changes. This final approval cannot be processed until it is clear the landowner has agreed and committed to the changes proposed. Certain contract changes do not require a signature. Minor contract changes that do not require a signature include:
Design quantities differ from those in the Conservation Program Contract: Situations arise when a final practice plan and design is completed which has significant differences in practice or component quantities from those that are in the conservation program contract. In those instances, clear communication with the program participant is critical. A meeting will be held with the landowner, reviewing the contract, the final design, and the proposed modification. A contract modification shall be completed and approved before the landowner is given authorization to begin practice implementation. Increases in contract obligation, resulting from this type of modification will be processed in accordance with all program rules and policy, and will depend upon the availability of funds in the appropriate cost overrun account. Cost Over-run During Practice Installation: Situations may also occur when there is a valid basis for a cost-overrun during installation of the practice, because of variations in on-site conditions during construction. These will fall into two general categories:
Communication: In all cases, when changes to a contract occur, communication with the landowner is critical. This includes going over a contract concurrently with the design, the "as-built," and any proposed modification. NRCS staff must communicate to the participant that, until a contract modification is processed and approved, NRCS's financial obligation remains as stated in the current contract. Additions to payments can only be processed if funds are available, regardless of on-site conditions. If you have any questions or concerns related to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me at (907)761-7757 or e-mail thomas.hedt@ak.usda.gov.
|
|