|
|
NRCS Alaska NewsFebruary 2, 2007
In This IssueAlaska Soil Predictions Maybe Possible with Techniques Under Evaluation Car Recycling Work Featured at AFE Hone Your Bear Knowledge and Skills Before Field Season
Alaska Soil Predictions Maybe Possible with Techniques Under EvaluationMike Mungoven, Soil Survey Project Leader
New techniques made possible by an expanded base of experience and knowledge now offer the chance to model and predict soil occurrence using some of these familiar digital layers and tools. These models go by various acronyms such as SoLIM (Soil Land Inference Model), SIE (Soil Inference Engine), PURC (Pedogenic Understanding Raster Classification), TEUI (Terrestrial Ecosystem Unit Inventory). Across the U.S., these models have been developed and applied to soil survey, in coordination with academics and private consultants, with good results. Alaska soil scientists are evaluating a method of soil prediction labeled RASP (Remote Access Soil Proxy) to determine if in our areas of limited accessibility we can apply a predictive method that is accurate, explicit, and useful. These models are only as accurate as the soil scientist’s understanding for the landscape is complete. Thorough and efficient field data collection is absolutely vital in the development of a good predictive model. Modeling, in theory, can lower the cost and improve the accuracy of soil surveys. Allied techniques can focus the soil scientists sampling design. For the soil scientists of Alaska this represents not so much anything brand new but a more complete use of the ArcGIS toolbox and a more rigorous and formal development of our comprehension of the soil forming factors which is then reproducible. Car Recycling Success Featured at AFE
In 2006, the Copper Valley Development Authority’s Abandoned Car Project, headed up by Arlene, removed more than 300 abandoned cars and inventoried another 350 for removal by contractors. Funding through the Environmental Protection Agency, the Bureau of Land Management and Natural Resources Conservation Service, the Kenny Lake Soil and Water Conservation District, landowners and the State of Alaska, along with support from Mt. Sanford Tribal Consortium, and the villages of Cheesh’Na, Gakona and Gulkana will allow the project to continue through 2007, extending north to Slana. Photo: Junk cars ready for removal.Hone Your Bear Knowledge and Skills Before Field SeasonRick McClure, Snow Survey Leader
The Bear Behavior portion of the course focuses on the two types of bears that are commonly encountered in the field in Alaska: the grizzly or brown bear and the black bear. The grizzly and brown bear are the same species but different in size due to habitat and food sources. The brown bear is more of a coastal/forest bear and has access to a large amount of protein by feeding on salmon through the summer and fall. These bears commonly grow to be 1,000 to 1,200 lbs and ten feet tall when standing on their hind legs. The grizzly bear is an interior bear and it does not have access to the salmon protein source. They are often more blonde colored and occupy the tundra regions of the state. These bears usually are in the 500 to 600 lb range and up to eight feet in height. The grizzly/brown bear are not true hibernators and will stay active as long as there is food available. They also will rise from their den in the middle of winter during a warm spell. They have been observed a couple of different years in January by cross country skiers in an area called the stadium inside Kincaid Park just south of Anchorage International Airport. The distinguishing characteristics between grizzly/brown bears and black bears is that the brown bear has a massive head, a dog face with an upturned muzzle, long claws, and a distinctive hump above its front shoulder blades. Black bears have a smaller, less robust build, a straight muzzle, no hump and shorter, curved claws. Both bears are omnivorous; they eat any high-protein, high-fat, high-energy food available. The grizzly/brown bear is more prone to maul humans when protecting a food cache or their young, whereas the black bear is more likely to stalk and kill humans. There were 189 recorded bear attacks from 1900 to 1998 and only 30 fatalities. NRCS field employees are issued 12-guage shotguns for bear protection if they complete the training and are certified. To get certified in the USFWS course taught in Anchorage, employees are required to shoot two complete sequences of fire at a silhouette target, and one sequence at a charging target. The silhouette target is 8 ½” x 11” and is placed 15 yards from the firing line.
It is also important to note that without firearms handling and shooting practice, your skills will fade dramatically. Therefore, before taking responsibility with other NRCS employees’ lives, it is important that you put forth the effort to hone your skills, and recognize any firearm proficiency limitations you may have. How often do we encounter bears on the job? This past summer we installed a site that bears frequented due to wild strawberries, but they left us and our equipment alone and we left them alone. Soil scientists reporting seeing bear signs frequently in the course of their work. An NRCS employee had a bear run-in while out on a Sunday morning walk. Bear encounters are quite frequent and do occur anywhere in Alaska. The NRCS provides excellent training to avoid bears and, if necessary, to protect yourself. Photo: Grizzly bear sow with cubs in Denali National Park. Photo by Tom Perkins.Changes to Service
Center Map
Some minor changes were made to the Service Center boundary map to move the Tyonek Tribal Conservation District to the Anchorage Field Office area. Please use the new map for any future publications. The maps can be found in Adobe Acrobat and photo formats at the links below: \\199.158.14.15/data/geodata/Cartographic/Official_Maps/fieldoffices.pdf \\199.158.14.15/data/geodata/Cartographic/Graphics/fieldoffices.jpg Personnel ActionsJob Announcement
|
|