| Question |
EQIP Criteria |
LWG Priority |
| 1 |
This project has a benefit to the highest priority locally identified
wildlife species. |
Moose (declining winter habitat and population) |
| 2 |
This project has a benefit to a secondary priority locally
identified wildlife species. |
Tundra Swans (subsistence, eggs and meat, and
declining population); Emperor Geese (declining populations) |
| 3 |
EQIP plan addresses natural resource concerns identified as high
priority by the Local Work Group. |
ATV induced trail erosion, moose habitat restoration
and protection. Declining animal habitat, water quality-surface and
ground, air quality-wild fire and CO2 sequestration. |
| 4 |
EQIP plan addresses natural resource concerns identified as
secondary priority by the Local Work Group. |
Waterfowl habitat protection. Forestland
productivity and health. Fish passage. |
| 5 |
EQIP plan includes practices that are identified as high
priority by the Local Work Group. |
Recreation trail and walkway. |
| 6 |
EQIP plan includes practices that are identified as secondary
priority by the Local Work Group. |
Stream-bank stabilization. Pest management, nutrient
management, irrigation water management. Fuel Break. Obstruction
removal. |
| 7 |
This project addresses locally identified noxious or invasive
species of concern. |
Hempnettle sp., Beaver (creating possible fish
passage problems) |
| 8 |
This project addresses one or more locally identified priority
subsistence species. |
Salmon (subsistence); Whitefish (subsistence, source
of meat during the winter); Blackfish (subsistence); Tomcod
(subsistence); Needlefish (subsistence); White-fronted Geese
(subsistence, eggs and meat); Canada Geese (subsistence, eggs and
meat); Salmonberries (subsistence). |