|
| |
WHIP Shallow Water Ranking Tool
Ranking Tool Summary for Shallow Water (Released 04/16/2009)
Description:
1. This ranking tool applies to WHIP applications in the category
for State WHIP priority three (3): Shallow water area restoration, enhancement
or creation for wetland waterfowl and wildlife.
2. Each ranked application must include a detailed written description
of the project proposed (WPO), provided to the NRCS State Biologist
before final ranking.
3. At risk species are defined as native species whose population (s)
or habitat is in danger of loss. The species must be listed as State or
Federal Threatened or Endangered, Candidate, or State
Species of Concern, or as focus species in Alaska's Comprehensive
Wildlife Conservation Strategy (CWCS).
4. A completed Wildlife Habitat Evaluation Guide (WHEG) is required in
support of each application on land uses for which they currently exist.
5 Proposed projects which include a new wetland development 500 ft.
or less from an inhabited dwelling, regularly used building or well
traveled unimproved public roadway are NOT eligible for
funding consideration.
6. For the purposes of WHIP, Noxious and Invasive weeds are those
species identified in the FOTG Section IV D. Conservation practices
"Pest Management and Invasive Weeds Fact Sheet and
List". Invasive animal species are those listed by ADF&G in "A
Comprehensive List and Select Species Reports".
http://www.adfg.state.ak.us/special/invasive/documents/invasivespp.report.pdf
7. Applications must score a minimum value of 65 points in the State
Issues Section of the Shallow Water Ranking Criteria to be eligible for
funding consideration.
Description:
Land Uses:
Crop,
Forest, Grazed Forest, Grazed Range, Hay, Native/Naturalized Pasture,
Natural Area, Pasture, Recreation, Water, Watershed Protection,
Wildlife Efficiency Score:
Scoring Multiplier:
1.00 Scoring Ranges and
Results Text:
| High: 570 - 370 |
Medium: 355 - 195 |
Low: 180 - 65 |
|
Represents projects which meet intent of program, and are
high priority for funding. |
Represents projects which
meet intent of program, and are medium priority for funding. |
Represents projects which meet intent of program, but are
low priority for funding. |
National Priorities:
Scoring Multiplier:
1.00 Scoring Ranges and
Results Text:
| High: 125 - 65 |
Medium: 60 - 20 |
Low: 15 - 0 |
|
Represents projects which meet intent of program, and are
high priority for funding. |
Represents projects which
meet intent of program, and are medium priority for funding. |
Represents projects which meet intent of program, but are
low priority for funding. |
Questions:
| Question Number |
Question |
Points |
| 1 |
Will
the treatment intended to implement using WHIP result in the restoration
of declining or important native fish and wildlife habitats? |
15 |
| 2 |
Are the planned restoration of
declining or important native fish and wildlife habitat conservation
practices of a self-sustaining nature such as a native perennial
plant? |
10 |
| 3 |
Will
the treatment intended to implement using WHIP result in the protection,
restoration, development or enhancement of fish and wildlife habitat to
benefit at-risk species? |
25 |
| 4 |
Will the treatment intended to
implement using WHIP result in the protection, restoration, development
or enhancement of wildlife habitat for Federally listed threatened and
endangered wildlife species? |
35 |
| 5 |
Will the treatment intended to
implement using WHIP result in the reduction of invasive species on fish
and wildlife habitats? |
25 |
| 6 |
Will
the treatment intended to implement using WHIP result in the protection,
restoration, development or enhancement of declining or important
aquatic wildlife species' habitats? |
15 |
| |
Total Points |
125 |
State Issues:
Scoring
Multiplier: 1.00 Scoring Ranges and Results
Text:
| High: 230 - 235 |
Medium: 230 - 145 |
Low: 140 - 65 |
|
Represents projects which meet intent of program, and are
high priority for funding. |
Represents projects which
meet intent of program, and are medium priority for funding. |
Represents projects which meet intent of program, but are
low priority for funding. |
Questions:
| Question Number |
Question |
Points |
| 1 |
This project contains a primary
treatment to address areas of significantly established noxious or
invasive species threatening on site, at risk native habitat, or
wildlife species, OR (answer only ONE from 1 - 3) |
40 |
| 2 |
This project contains a primary treatment to address areas
with minor presence of noxious or invasive species threatening on site,
at risk native habitat, or wildlife species, OR (answer only ONE from 1
- 3). |
20 |
| 3 |
This project contains a primary
treatment to address areas with minor presence of noxious or invasive
species threatening on site, native habitat, or wildlife species, OR
(answer only ONE from 1 - 3). |
10 |
| 4 |
This project contains practices which will actively address
two or more priorities of the State WHIP Plan. |
25 |
| 5 |
This project provides for the rehabilitation of critical
wildlife habitat which has been impacted by man made, or natural
disasters such as local or regional drying or loss of wetlands by
climate change or prolonged lowering of water tables. ("disaster"
designation must be concurred by NRCS) |
25 |
| 6 |
This conservation project applies practices which provide
significant benefits to a listed state or federal sensitive, threatened
or endangered species, or a focus species as designated in the Alaska's
Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy (CWCS). |
40 |
| 7 |
This project will actively restore or enhance existing
surface water and wetland vegetation greater than 1.0 acres in size, in
an isolated area. An isolated area is: A project site at least 1,000
ft. from an inhabited dwelling, regularly used building or well
travelled unimproved public roadway and receives visitation or
disturbance by humans less than twice per week during periods of bird
nesting and migration. OR (answer only ONE from questions 7 OR
8) |
30 |
| 8 |
This project is NOT in an isolated
area, however, it creates new shallow water/ wetland sites > 1.5 acres
in size located in areas with moderate to heavy human disturbances.
Moderate to heavy human disturbances are characterized by sites less
than 1000 ft from occupied or regularly used dwellings, or well
travelled unimproved public roadways. Under no circumstances can project
site be closer than 500' to a residence, barn, or other building/
structure determined by NRCS to be of a disturbance concern. These sites
also receive visitation or use by humans two or more times per week
during periods of local bird nesting and shorebird or waterfowl
migration.(answer only ONE from questions 7 OR 8) |
15 |
| 9 |
This project includes active structural (vegetative or
artificial) components for restoring/ creating nesting habitat as well
as providing foraging, brooding, loafing and/or roosting areas for both
waterfowl and shorebirds. |
15 |
| 10 |
The project plan actively restores or creates a diversity of
water depth areas (3 or more) where at least 60% of the surface area is
< 6" deep, and no area exceeds a 6' depth. (All projects must meet
practice code 646 Shallow Water Management for Wildlife
specifications). |
15 |
| 11 |
Project plan actively restores, or
significantly enhances or creates vegetative habitats (woody riparian
species) for migratory avian passerine species. |
15 |
| 12 |
Project plan contains measures and management to insure
access by large wildlife species and restricts or excludes domestic
livestock if present. (if no livestock is or will be present check
Yes) |
15 |
| 13 |
Any planting plan or expected
regeneration is/ has been developed utilizing/ or encourages only
ecologically appropriate native species. (only answer ONE from 13 OR
14). |
30 |
| 14 |
This project will use less than
100% native plant species in the planting plan, or non-native plant
species may encroach the site due to absence of control efforts. (only
answer ONE from 13 OR 14). |
5 |
| 15 |
Besides the landowner, this project will be cost shared by a
State or Federal agency or other partner which will reduce NRCS cost
share by a minimum of $10,000 or 15%, whichever is less. |
25 |
| 16 |
This project will be closed out with all contract items
completed and paid in three years or less |
35 |
| |
Maximum Points: 310 Total Points |
360 |
Local Issues:
Scoring Multiplier: 1.00
Scoring Ranges and Results Text:
| High: 115 - 70 |
Medium: 65 - 30 |
Low: 25 - 0 |
|
Represents projects which meet intent of program, and are
high priority for funding. |
Represents projects which
meet intent of program, and are medium priority for funding. |
Represents projects which meet intent of program, but are
low priority for funding. |
Questions:
| Question Number |
Question |
Points |
| 1 |
This project has a benefit to the
highest priority locally identified wildlife species. |
25 |
| 2 |
This project has a benefit to a secondary priority locally
identified wildlife species. |
10 |
| 3 |
This project addresses one or more locally identified
priority subsistence species. |
20 |
| 4 |
This project has a benefit to a plant species identified as
a local priority. |
15 |
| 5 |
This project addresses locally identified noxious or
invasive species of concern |
20 |
| 6 |
This project occurs in, or within three miles of, a locally
identified special ecological management area. |
25 |
| |
Maximum Points: 115 Total Points |
115 |
< Back to WHIP>
| |
|